Buy me a coffee

Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com

Thursday, September 24, 2026

Why the Ancients Despised Merchants and Entertainers (And Why They Were Right)


Walk through any major city today, or scroll through a social media feed, and the pinnacle of our social hierarchy becomes instantly clear. At the absolute top of the modern pyramid sit the billionaire tech mogul and the Hollywood celebrity. We have constructed a civilization that treats the manipulation of capital and the mastery of performance as the highest indicators of human worth. This cultural obsession directly dictates our politics. We are governed by professional showmen who have transitioned seamlessly from the screen to the state house, and by corporate tycoons who promise to "run the country like a business."

The ancient world foresaw this exact crisis and intentionally built their civilizations to prevent it. To understand how upside-down our world has become, we must first look backward to an era when societies were anchored by tangible reality, and those who traded in empty noise or pure profit were viewed with deep suspicion.

Part 1: The Ancient Social Order—Parasites and Outcasts
In the foundational civilizations of human history, social status was tied strictly to structural contribution. If you did not grow, build, or protect the physical fabric of reality, you were viewed as a destabilizing force.
                           THE ANCIENT HIERARCHY OF SUBSTANCE
   
   ▲ THE PRODUCERS (Highly Valued Bedrocks):
   │  • The Scholars & Bureaucrats (The Moral & Intellectual Compass)
   │  • The Farmers & Peasants (The Sacred Hands That Fed the Empire)
   │  • The Craftsmen & Artisans (The Skilled Builders of Physical Reality)
   ▼
   ▼ THE MARGINALIZED (The Toxic Tiers):
      • The Merchants (Economic Parasites / Manipulators of Wealth)
      • The Entertainers & Gladiators (Social Outcasts / Masters of Deception)
Imperial China and Feudal Japan: The Parasitic Merchant
For centuries, East Asian civilization was governed by the Sishi, the Confucian four-class social hierarchy. At the top were the Shi (scholars and administrators), followed closely by the Nong (farmers and peasants). Farmers were deeply respected because they tilled the sacred earth and directly produced the food that sustained human life. Below them were the Gong (craftsmen and artisans) who possessed the tangible skills to forge tools, weapons, and infrastructure.
At the dead bottom of this pyramid sat the Shang—the merchants.
To the Confucian mind, the merchant was a societal parasite. They did not grow a single grain of rice; they did not forge a single iron nail. They simply moved goods from Point A to Point B, manipulated prices, and pocketed the profit. They accumulated liquid wealth by exploiting the labor of the true producers.
In Feudal Japan, the samurai class enforced this hierarchy with strict legal violence. Merchants were forbidden from wearing silk, banned from living in aristocratic neighborhoods, and legally barred from entering government service. The state intentionally humiliated the merchant class to prevent fluid capital from ever overriding the moral authority of the state.
Ancient Rome: The Disgrace of the Showman
While East Asia suppressed the merchant, Republican and Imperial Rome targeted the entertainer. The Romans were obsessed with civic dignity, bodily autonomy, and self-mastery. To a Roman patrician, allowing oneself to be a spectacle for a paying crowd was the ultimate degradation.
Under Roman law, actors, gladiators, and charioteers were branded with infamia—literal social infamy.
To be infames meant you were legally stripped of your rights as a citizen. Actors could not vote, they could not hold public office, and they could not seek justice in a court of law. If a Roman citizen decided to step onto a theater stage or enter the arena, they were legally equivalent to a prostitute or a slave. The Romans recognized that an actor is a professional deceiver, trained to mimic virtue, fake emotions, and manipulate public feeling for applause. They knew that a man who sells his emotions for coin has no core identity and cannot be trusted with the sacred duty of the Republic.

Part 2: The Historical Flip—From Substance to Spectacle
How did we get from an era that humbled the merchant and banished the actor to a world that worships them? The turning point was the Industrial Revolution and the rise of mass media, which decoupled social status from physical production.
Over the course of the 20th century, Western civilization transitioned from a producer culture to a consumer culture. As the economy shifted from factories and farms to financial markets and public relations, we stopped asking what a person could build, grow, or defend. Instead, we began asking how much capital they controlled or how well they performed under a camera lens.
The merchant evolved into the corporate executive, using liquid capital to fund political lobbying and rewrite laws. The entertainer evolved into the celebrity, weaponizing human attention into billions of dollars. Together, they inverted the ancient pyramid, pushing the true builders—the farmers, the mechanics, the engineers, and the soldiers—into the forgotten underclass.

Part 3: The Modern Illusion of Leadership
Because our culture has flipped, our political landscape has dissolved into an unholy alliance of theater and corporate boardrooms.
The Politician as Actor
Because modern statecraft is entirely mediated by screens, we have allowed politics to become a branch of show business, realizing Rome's worst fears. Ronald Reagan pioneered the Hollywood-to-White-House pipeline, using his cinematic charisma to reshape global economics. Donald Trump weaponized his reality-television persona to turn the presidency into a non-stop, high-ratings spectacle. In Europe, Volodymyr Zelensky literally played a fictional president on a Ukrainian comedy series before being elected as the actual president, proving that the line between political theater and physical reality has completely vanished.
This system rewards the best performer, not the best leader. It results in a culture where wealthy, brainless celebrities regularly lecture the public on complex macroeconomic policy or geopolitics from award-show stages. This modern absurdity was perfectly exposed by comedian Ricky Gervais at the 2020 Golden Globes, when he famously told the Hollywood elite to stop using their platforms for political grandstanding, noting that they are entirely out of touch with the real world, know nothing about reality, and should simply accept their little trophies and shut up.
The Politician as Businessman
When the public tires of actors, they turn to the billionaire, buying into the corporate myth that a state should be "run like a business." Tycoons like Silvio Berlusconi in Italy or Michael Bloomberg in New York have treated vast territories and millions of citizens as corporate subsidiaries.
But a state is not a business. A corporation exists to narrow costs, eliminate redundancies, and maximize profit for a tiny group of shareholders. A state exists to expand the common good, protect public health, and ensure infrastructure stability for all its citizens. When a merchant-politician takes power, public goods—housing, healthcare, and education—are financialized and bled dry for short-term profit. The merchant knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.
Part 4: The Alliance of "Bread and Circuses"—How the Inversion Corrupts Society
To understand the full depth of the modern crisis, we must look at how these two historically suppressed classes—the merchant and the entertainer—have formed a symbiotic alliance. Individually, they represent distinct societal threats: the merchant seeks the total commodification of life, while the entertainer seeks the total monopoly of attention. Together, they execute the modern iteration of the Roman elite's most cynical political tool: "Bread and Circuses" (Panem et Circenses).
In this unholy coalition, the roles have shifted, but the corruption remains identical. The billionaire merchant class provides the corporate infrastructure, the algorithms, and the capital ("the bread"). In return, the entertainer class provides the non-stop cultural distraction ("the circus"). This alliance works systematically to pacify the public, paralyze civic duty, and completely corrupt the state from the inside out.
                           THE BREAD AND CIRCUSES CYNICISM
   
   ┌────────────────────────────────┐       ┌────────────────────────────────┐
   │      THE MERCHANT CLASS        │       │     THE ENTERTAINER CLASS      │
   │         (Hard Power)           │       │          (Soft Power)          │
   ├────────────────────────────────┤       ├────────────────────────────────┤
   │ • Owns media & tech platforms  │ ───►  │ • Monopolizes public attention │
   │ • Financializes infrastructure │ ◄───  │ • Promotes consumerist values  │
   └────────────────────────────────┘       └────────────────────────────────┘
                   │                                         │
                   └───────────────────┬─────────────────────┘
                                       ▼
                       [ SYSTEMIC CIVIC PARALYSIS ]
                        • Outrage replaces governance
                        • Speculative profits bleed the working class
The Financialization of Culture
When merchants control the stage, culture ceases to be an artistic pursuit or a reflection of shared societal values; it becomes a pure extraction mechanism. The modern media landscape is completely monopolized by a handful of massive conglomerates run by financial speculators.
To these platforms, human attention is a commodity to be mined and sold to the highest bidder. Musicians, filmmakers, and digital creators are no longer judged by the depth of their work, but by their algorithmic efficiency—their ability to spark outrage, keep users scrolling, and drive consumer spending. This environment strips society of genuine intellectual depth, replacing it with a hyper-commodified, addictive feedback loop that degrades public sanity for quarterly profit margins.
The Weaponization of Distraction
The most insidious aspect of this alliance is how it neutralizes political resistance. As the merchant class quietly buys up real estate, spikes the cost of living, and lobbies governments to slash public services, the entertainer class is deployed to keep the populace looking the other way.
Every structural economic failure—from stagnant wages to the collapse of local manufacturing—is buried under a non-stop avalanche of cultural culture wars, celebrity gossip, and performative outrage. The public is kept so thoroughly amused, addicted, and divided by the "circus" that they lose the collective will to confront the "merchants" who are actively bleeding their economic foundations dry.
The Devaluation of Truth and Competence
Ultimately, the alliance of bread and circuses corrupts the very concept of truth. Because both merchants and entertainers survive on optics rather than tangible substance, public discourse becomes entirely untethered from reality.
A society governed by this dynamic loses its capacity to solve real problems. Infrastructure decays, healthcare systems fail, and supply chains fracture because the ruling elite lacks the physical competence of the craftsman, the tactical responsibility of the soldier, and the foundational wisdom of the farmer. When the showman and the speculator run the empire, reality becomes an afterthought—until the structural foundations finally collapse under the weight of the illusion.
Part 5: The Socialist Attempt—An Industrial Return to the Producer
In the mid-19th century, as industrial capitalism solidified the rule of the corporate titan, a massive philosophical movement emerged to directly challenge the inversion of the social pyramid: socialism.
At its core, Marxist theory was a radical, industrialized attempt to restore the ancient producer-first hierarchy. Karl Marx's critique of the bourgeoisie was fundamentally identical to the ancient Confucian disdain for the Shang merchant class. Marx argued that the capitalist merchant was a structural parasite who created absolutely no tangible value. Instead, the merchant simply inserted themselves between the worker and the machine, extracting "surplus value" (profit) from the physical sweat and skill of the person actually building reality.
                           THE SOCIALIST PYRAMID INVERSION
   
   [ IDEAL: PROLETARIAN RULE ]                      [ REALITY: THE BUREAUCRATIC TRAP ]
   
   ▲ ELEVATED CASTE:                                ▲ THE NEW APEX:
   │  • Factory Workers, Laborers & Craftsmen       │  • The Nomenklatura (Party Bureaucrats)
   │  • Collective Farmers & Agriculturalists        │  • State Managers & Apparatchiks
   ▼                                                ▼
   ▼ ELIMINATED:                                    ▼ SILENCED BASE:
      • Private Merchants, CEOs & Speculators          • The Working Class (Strictly Controlled)
To correct this, socialism proposed the "Dictatorship of the Proletariat"—a system where political and economic power would be stripped from financial speculators and handed entirely to the producers: the factory laborers, the skilled craftsmen, and the agricultural workers.
For a time, the cultural aesthetics of the socialist world explicitly reflected this ancient inversion. In the Soviet Union and mid-century Eastern Bloc nations, public spaces were completely cleared of commercial advertisements and celebrity gossip. Instead, giant monuments and public billboards celebrated the worker. Heroic coal miners, collective farmers holding sheaves of wheat, and factory engineers were elevated as the nation's true celebrities and moral paradigms. It was an explicit attempt to force society to venerates the hands that build, rather than the pockets that extract.
The Failure: The Rise of the Managerial Caste
However, the tragic irony of the 20th-century socialist experiment is that in its attempt to destroy the merchant, it accidentally created a new, equally parasitic elite. By nationalizing all industries and erasing the free market, socialist states did not actually hand power to the factory worker or the farmer. Instead, they concentrated total control into the hands of a massive, hyper-centralized state apparatus run by the Nomenklatura—a privileged caste of career bureaucrats, party apparatchiks, and state managers.
These bureaucrats did not swing hammers, till the soil, or fight on the front lines. Yet, just like the modern corporate executive, they held absolute monopoly power over how resources were managed and distributed. The worker remained at the bottom, stripped of autonomy, while a new class of non-producing managers lived in luxury.
The failure of historical socialism serves as a crucial warning for the modern world: simply destroying the private merchant is not enough. If you replace the corporate CEO with a career government bureaucrat, you have not returned power to the producer; you have merely traded one abstract middleman for another. A true return to a balanced society requires elevating physical competence and tangible risk, ensuring that those who directly cultivate reality are the ones who guide it.

Part 6: What a Producer-Venerated World Looks Like Today
If we barred the pure financial speculator and the professional showman from high office, and mandated that our leaders must be drawn from the ranks of soldiers, craftsmen, farmers, and scientific producers, the world would structurally transform.
The Rule of the Farmer: Food Sovereignty over Global Capital
If our politicians were farmers, the state would prioritize the physical health of the soil and the population over the abstract metrics of the stock market. A farmer-politician understands that a nation that cannot feed itself is not a sovereign nation. Under their rule, corporate agriculture monopolies would be dismantled. Local farming ecosystems would be protected, and the mass production of chemical-laden, hyper-processed foods would be treated as a national security threat.
The Rule of the Craftsman: The Renaissance of Physical Competence
A politician who is a craftsman, builder, or engineer understands the absolute, unforgiving nature of physical laws. If you build a bridge poorly, it collapses. A craftsman cannot lie their way out of a bad piece of work. A government composed of builders would focus intensely on physical infrastructure, domestic manufacturing, and tech hardware rather than speculative software apps or financial derivatives. Tech companies that merely "move things around" (like food-delivery apps or predatory speculative crypto platforms) would be heavily restricted.
The Rule of the Soldier: Genuine Strategic Responsibility
A leader who has served in a military capacity understands the absolute weight of violence and the true cost of peace. In the modern West, career politicians who have never heard a shot fired in anger routinely deploy young men and women into endless, abstract foreign interventions to satisfy defense-industry lobbyists. A soldier-politician, possessing true skin in the game, treats military intervention as an absolute last resort, focusing state policy on genuine homeland defense and border integrity.

Part 7: The Chinese Billboard Shift
This alternative hierarchy is not a distant, utopian fantasy; we are seeing flashes of it occur in the modern world today. In a fascinating cultural experiment, China has begun actively replacing commercial luxury advertisements and celebrity billboards in major cities with giant portraits of scientists, innovators, and agricultural revolutionaries.
Instead of walking through a subway station or past a mega-mall and seeing a fashion influencer or an actor selling perfume, citizens in Beijing and Shanghai are confronted with massive images of aerospace pioneer Qian Xuesen, Nobel Prize-winning medical researcher Tu Youyou, or Yuan Longping, the agricultural scientist who developed the hybrid rice strains that saved millions from starvation.
This is a modern, state-backed application of the ancient Confucian Shi (Scholar/Producer) ideal. The Chinese state has explicitly recognized that public attention is a finite, strategic resource. By treating scientists and builders as the nation's true "Top Stars," they are intentionally shaping the aspirations of the youth. They are teaching the next generation to admire the mind that solves a crisis, rather than the face that acts it out.

Conclusion: Is It Time to Pull Down the Showmen?
The modern crisis of leadership is entirely self-inflicted. We are a society that has chosen to worship the middleman, the speculator, and the performer, and we wonder why our infrastructure is decaying, our public discourse is hollow, and our economies feel like predatory casino games.
The ancients were not being snobbish when they suppressed the merchant and the entertainer; they were practicing early civilizational risk management. They knew that money and attention are volatile, intoxicating forces that, if left unchecked, will devour the core pillars of a healthy society. It is time to pull down the billboards of the showmen, reject the empty promises of the corporate oligarchy, and return the stewardship of our world to the people who know how to build it.

The Upside of Fewer Babies: Why Falling Birth Rates Are a Blessing in Disguise



Turn on the news or scroll through social media, and you will find an endless parade of tech billionaires, politicians, and economists panicking about a "demographic winter." Global birth rates are falling, and the conventional wisdom screams that this is an unmitigated disaster. We are warned of collapsing pension systems, empty classrooms, and economic stagnation. The narrative is clear: if we stop growing, we die.

But this panic relies on an outdated, unsustainable model of infinite growth on a finite planet. What if the global decline in birth rates is not a crisis at all? What if it is actually a necessary course correction for humanity?
When you look past the corporate fearmongering, a smaller global population presents an extraordinary opportunity. By embracing a world with fewer people, we can unlock massive environmental relief, build an economy that favors workers over capital, and drastically improve the daily quality of life for the people who are already here.

🌍 Part 1: Environmental and Climate Relief
The most immediate and undeniable beneficiary of a lower birth rate is the planet. For over a century, human population growth has closely tracked the destruction of Earth’s biosphere. Reversing this trend is the single most powerful lever we have for long-term ecological recovery.
A Deep Breath for the Climate
Every new human being added to the planet requires energy, food, clothing, shelter, and transport. While reducing individual carbon footprints through green energy is vital, reducing the sheer number of consumers is far more mathematically effective. A smaller population naturally translates to fewer cars on the road, lower demands on power grids, and a sharp reduction in industrial manufacturing emissions. It creates a natural cooling mechanism for global carbon trajectories, giving our climate mitigation efforts a fighting chance to succeed.
Space for Wildlife and Ecosystems to Heal
The climate crisis is only half the battle; the biodiversity crisis is just as severe. To feed eight billion people, humanity has cleared forests, drained wetlands, and converted vast swaths of wild land into monoculture farming and urban sprawl. As population pressure eases, the demand for agricultural land will contract. Marginal farmland can be rewilded. Forests can expand again, and endangered species will have the physical habitat required to bounce back from the brink of extinction.
Preserving Finite Resources
We live in a world of strictly limited resources. From the fresh water aquifers being pumped dry across Western nations and Asia to the rare earth minerals required to build solar panels and batteries, human demand is outstripping Earth’s supply. A declining population eases the strain on these critical resources. It secures fresh water availability for future generations and ensures that our transition to a sustainable infrastructure does not trigger a violent global scramble for the planet's remaining raw materials.

💼 Part 2: The Economic "Premium" for Workers
The loudest critics of low birth rates are corporate executives and pro-growth economists. Their fear is rooted in a simple reality: the modern economic system is a pyramid scheme that requires a constant influx of cheap, young labor to sustain corporate profits and prop up legacy asset values. A shrinking population flips this dynamic completely, shifting power from capital back to labor.
The Law of Supply and Demand for Labor
When the labor supply shrinks, the value of the individual worker skyrockets. For the past forty years, globalization and population growth have created a massive surplus of labor, allowing corporations to keep wages stagnant while demanding longer hours. A lower birth rate forces companies to actively compete for a limited pool of talent. To attract and retain employees, businesses must offer higher wages, robust benefits, flexible working conditions, and healthier work-life balances. The end of cheap labor is the beginning of a prosperous working class.
The Acceleration of Meaningful Automation
Critics argue that without young workers, society will run out of people to do essential, labor-intensive tasks. But labor scarcity is the ultimate catalyst for technological innovation. When human labor is cheap, companies have no incentive to innovate; they simply exploit the surplus. When labor becomes expensive, industries are forced to aggressively adopt artificial intelligence, robotics, and automation. This shift will allow machines to handle dangerous, repetitive, or mundane tasks—such as automated logistics, agricultural harvesting, and data entry—leaving humans to focus on highly skilled, creative, and emotionally intelligent work.
The Deflation of the Housing Crisis
In almost every major city across the globe, housing has become wildly unaffordable. This is a simple math problem: too many people chasing too little land. Urban centers have become hyper-congested, driving rents and home prices to predatory levels. A shrinking population organically cools overheated real estate markets. As demand stabilizes and eventually falls, housing transitions from a speculative financial asset back into what it was always meant to be: an affordable, accessible human right. Younger generations will finally be able to secure housing security without taking on catastrophic levels of debt.

🏆 Part 3: Quality of Life and Social Benefits
A society obsessed with raw economic output often forgets to measure the actual well-being of its citizens. Moving away from the crowded, high-pressure environment of a growing population allows us to pivot from prioritizing quantity of life to prioritizing quality of life.
Hyper-Funded, Intimate Education
In a high-birth-rate world, public education systems are perpetually underfunded and overwhelmed. Teachers face overcrowded classrooms of thirty or forty students, leading to burnout and subpar learning environments. A lower birth rate naturally shrinks class sizes. This allows public resources to be concentrated more heavily per child. Teachers can provide tailored, individual attention, and school budgets can stretch further to fund arts, sports, mental health resources, and advanced sciences. We will raise a generation that is far better educated and emotionally resilient.
Relief for Public Infrastructure
Our daily lives are plagued by the frictions of overpopulation. We endure soul-crushing traffic gridlock on the way to work, months-long waiting lists for critical healthcare procedures, and decaying public parks and transport systems under the weight of constant use. A lower population density instantly relieves this structural stress. Commutes shorten, emergency rooms become less chaotic, and public spaces become cleaner and more peaceful. Cities become livable, breathing spaces rather than hyper-competitive survival arenas.
Shifting Value from Economic Cog to Human Being
In a hyper-growth society, individuals are often viewed merely as economic units—future taxpayers needed to fund the state or consumers needed to buy products. When people are scarce, they are valued. A society with fewer people is culturally incentivized to take better care of the citizens it already has. Government policy naturally shifts away from corporate subsidies toward robust public health, preventative care, mental health support, and lifelong learning.

🧩 Confronting the Transition Challenges
It would be intellectually dishonest to pretend a declining population comes without friction. The transition period—often called the "demographic pinch"—poses real challenges, particularly regarding aging populations and the funding of legacy social security systems. However, these are not existential crises; they are manageable design flaws in our economic infrastructure.
Pension systems built on the assumption that five young workers will always fund one retiree must be systematically reformed. This can be achieved by taxing the massive productivity gains generated by AI and automation, rather than relying solely on income taxes tied to human labor. Furthermore, as healthcare advances compression of morbidity—keeping people healthier for longer—the nature of retirement and senior community participation will organically evolve. The challenges of a demographic shift are structural puzzles to be solved, not a reason to recklessly breed our way into ecological collapse.

🏁 Conclusion: A Maturing Civilization
The panic over declining birth rates is a symptom of a corporate worldview that cannot see past the next quarterly earnings report. It is the anxiety of a system that demands cancer-like, infinite growth on a planet that cannot sustain it.
Humanity is not dying out; we are simply maturing. Just as an ecosystem reaches a stable, prosperous climax state after a period of rapid growth, human civilization is transitioning away from chaotic expansion toward a sustainable equilibrium.
Fewer babies mean a cooler planet, wealthier workers, affordable homes, and a society that values the depth of human experience over the sheer breadth of human numbers. Low birth rates are not a sign of civilizational decay. They are a sign of a society smart enough to stop running on a treadmill, step off, and build a world built for human flourishing.

buy my books

Why the Ancients Despised Merchants and Entertainers (And Why They Were Right)

Walk through any major city today, or scroll through a social media feed, and the pinnacle of our social hierarchy becomes instantly clear. ...