Thursday, July 9, 2026

Recycled Plots, Constant Threat: Why "Fauda" and "Tehran" Are Still Great TV



If you have watched more than two seasons of Netflix's Fauda or Apple TV’s Tehran, you have likely experienced a distinct sense of déjà vu. You aren't imagining things. Both of these massive Israeli espionage hits operate on a strictly recycled blueprint. They change the villains, upgrade the weapons, and swap out the safehouses, but underneath the hood, the engine is exactly the same every single season.
Yet, despite being incredibly formulaic, we cannot tear our eyes away. Why do these shows continue to be stellar, high-octane television even when we know exactly what is going to happen next?
The Copy-Paste Blueprints
Let's look at the underlying math of both shows. They rely on distinct, looping formulas that the writers refuse to abandon.
The Fauda Formula
Every season of Fauda follows a predictable checklist:
  1. Doron Kavillio is either retired, farming olives, or suspended for being an absolute loose cannon.
  2. A new, terrifyingly competent terrorist mastermind emerges.
  3. Doron is pulled back into the undercover unit because "only he can solve this," usually because of a personal connection.
  4. An undercover operation goes sideways in a crowded market or apartment complex.
  5. A beloved team member gets captured or brutally killed, transforming the mission into a raw, vengeance-fueled manhunt for the rest of the season.
The Tehran Formula
Tehran simply shifts the setting to Iran but uses the exact same conveyor belt:
  1. Tamar Rabinyan is smuggled into Tehran to hack a massive military facility or air defence system.
  2. The initial plan immediately fails because someone forgets a passport, a contact betrays them, or an asset panics.
  3. Tamar spending the next six episodes running through alleys, hiding with underground student groups, and frantically typing on a laptop while the Iranian Revolutionary Guard closes in.
  4. Mossad headquarters threatens to burn her as an asset, but she pulls off a miracle digital bypass at the final second.
       [THE ESPIONAGE THRILLER REPETITION LOOP]
         ┌─────────────────────────────────┐
         ▼                                 │
[Flawed Agent Enters] ➔ [Plan Fails Instantly] ➔ [Tragedy / Revenge]
Why Recycled Plots Still Work: The Art of Tension
If a standard network cop drama used the same plot structure every season, audiences would abandon it by episode three. Fauda and Tehran escape this fate because they excel at something very few Western shows understand: claustrophobic, relentless tension.
These shows do not care about slow-burn political monologues in air-conditioned boardrooms. They drop you directly into the dirt. The tension is incredibly intimate. A single ringing cell phone, a slightly hesitant greeting, or a nervous look toward a security camera means instant, violent death.
By keeping the pacing at a breakneck speed, the writers don't give your brain the time to sit back and analyze the plot holes. You are too busy gripping your seat as Doron clears a hallway, or sweating alongside Tamar as an Iranian agent knocks on her apartment door.
The Illusion of Safety is Dead
The second reason these formulaic shows remain elite television is that they completely reject Hollywood safety nets.
In a Western thriller, you know the main hero's best friend or love interest will likely make it to the end of the series intact. In Fauda and Tehran, no one is safe. Main characters, moral anchors, and fan favorites are casually executed mid-season. The stakes feel genuinely real because the shows are deeply cynical about survival.
Because the threat of permanent loss is always present, the recycled plot points don't feel lazy; they feel like the tragic, inescapable reality of a never-ending real-world conflict.
The Verdict
Fauda and Tehran are essentially the comfort food of the thriller genre. They aren't trying to reinvent the wheel of television writing. They find a high-stakes, anxiety-inducing scenario that works, and they press repeat.
It is repetitive, it is predictable, and it is undeniably formulaic. But when the action starts and the music swells, it is still some of the best, most gripping television on the planet.

Parasite 2: The Hermit Kingdom – Why Bong Joon-ho’s Hypothetical Cyber-Thriller is the Sequel We Need



When Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite made history by sweeping the Academy Awards, it delivered a definitive, masterfully contained critique of capitalist inequality in South Korea. The story felt complete. But in an era obsessed with franchises, the mind naturally wanders to what a hypothetical Parasite 2 would look like.

If Bong were to return to this universe, the most brilliant move wouldn't be revisiting the ruins of the Park family mansion. It would be crossing the Demilitarized Zone.
Imagine Parasite 2: The Hermit Kingdom—a high-stakes, darkly comedic psychological thriller set entirely within the claustrophobic, hyper-surveilled reality of North Korea. Instead of poor families hiding in basements to scam wealthy elites, the parasites this time are an elite cyber-cabal operating from the shadows of Pyongyang, draining global banks to fund a regime that is actively consuming itself.
The Premise: The Digital Bloodsuckers of Pyongyang
In this hypothetical sequel, the "parasites" are a brilliant, desperate family of state-trained hackers trapped inside a specialized cyber-warfare division. They don't live in a sub-basement; they live in a sterile, concrete compound, working around the clock under the watchful eye of the Ministry of State Security.
Their mission? Infiltrate international financial networks, deploy ransomware, and siphon billions in cryptocurrency to fund the luxurious lifestyles of Kim Jong-un and his inner circle.
The dark comedy and tension mirror the original film, but the stakes are exponentially higher. The family must perfectly forge digital credentials, fake absolute ideological loyalty to the Supreme Leader, and ruthlessly sabotage rival government departments just to keep their access to electricity, meat, and internet privileges. They are bloodsuckers for the state, feeding an insatiable dictator while the rest of the country starves.
   [Global Banks / Crypto] 
              │
              ▼ (Siphoned by)
   [The Cyber-Cabal Family] ───► Sacrifices freedom / fakes loyalty
              │
              ▼ (Funnelled to)
      [The Kim Regime]     ───► Consumes wealth / starves the nation
The Breaking Point: Realizing the Host is Dying
The turning point of the film shifts the metaphor on its head. In the original movie, the Kim family realized they could never truly become the host. In Parasite 2, the cyber-cabal comes to a far more terrifying realization: their host is a cancer.
While reviewing encrypted state ledgers to cover up a laundering trace, the father—a high-ranking digital architect and state official—uncovers the absolute rot of the system. He looks at the data and realizes that no matter how many billions they steal from the West, the wealth is entirely trapped at the very top. The system is structurally incapable of sustaining itself. He realizes that he, his family, and the entire military apparatus aren't just serving a leader—they are parasites eating away at the flesh of their own homeland until nothing is left.
Two Distant Paths: The Alternate Climaxes
Bong Joon-ho loves a devastating, structurally brilliant finale. For a film of this scale, the narrative inevitably marches toward one of two explosive, pitch-black conclusions:

The Revised Climaxes: Two Triumphant Paths
Ending A: The Military Coup (The General’s Justice)
The film’s tension reaches a boiling point when a battle-hardened Frontline Army General uncovers what the cyber-cabal has been doing. Realizing that the billions stolen by the hackers are being squandered on luxury yachts and private palaces while his front-line soldiers are starving in the mud, the General decides he has had enough.
In a perfectly coordinated, adrenaline-fueled sequence, the General launches a swift and decisive military coup. Tanks roll into the Pyongyang elite districts under the cover of a massive digital blackout engineered by a sympathetic low-level programmer.
The climax is a masterclass in poetic justice: the General’s forces breach the inner sanctum, arresting Kim Jong-un and his entire corrupt cabinet. The final, deeply satisfying sequence shows the dictator and his loyal elites stripped of their luxury garments, dressed in drab prison uniforms, and locked away in the very political labor camps they used to terrorize the nation. The gates of North Korea are thrown open, the prisons are emptied, and the Korean people are finally, genuinely free.
[The Coup Sequence]
Digital Blackout ➔ Tanks Enter Pyongyang ➔ Kim & Cabal Arrested ➔ Sent to Prison Camps ➔ Liberty
Ending B: The Prosperous Defection (The Ultimate Wealth & Peace)
In this version, the brilliant high-ranking digital architect plays the ultimate long game. Before making his move, he uses his absolute control over the state's cyber-warfare servers to quietly skim fractions of a percent from the stolen global crypto funds, routing them into an un-traceable, heavily encrypted Swiss offshore account completely separated from the regime.
When the heat gets too high, he executes a flawless, high-tech escape plan. Utilizing a custom-built virus that temporarily blinds the DMZ satellite tracking and automated border guns, he safely guides his entire family across the border into South Korea.
Instead of a bleak ending, this is a triumphant victory. The family accesses the hidden fortune, instantly cementing themselves as part of Seoul’s ultra-wealthy elite. The final sequence is a beautiful, sun-drenched montage of peace and prosperity. We see the family living in a breathtaking, high-security smart-mansion overlooking the Han River, their children attending top-tier universities, and the parents running a legitimate, highly successful venture capital firm. They didn't just escape the prison of the North; they mastered the freedom of the South, achieving total security, absolute peace of mind, and generational wealth.
The Verdict
Parasite 2: The Hermit Kingdom would be a cinematic masterpiece because it takes the core theme of the original—systemic exploitation—and scales it up to a geopolitical level. It proves that whether you are hiding under a coffee table in Seoul or hacking central banks in Pyongyang, the tragedy of the modern world remains identical: everyone is trying to survive by feeding off a system designed to crush them.

Cursed by a Trinket: Why "Obsession" is a Disgusting, Overrated Chore

 


The horror community has a serious problem with overhyping micro-budget novelties. The absolute pinnacle of this delusion is the massive 2026 box office sensation Obsession. Directed by YouTube creator Curry Barker and produced on a shoe-string $750,000 budget, the film has somehow raked in over $400 million and secured an unearned 94% on Rotten Tomatoes.

Let’s be entirely fair: the fundamental premise is excellent. It taps into the classic, terrifying Monkey’s Paw or "be careful what you wish for" scenario. An awkward, romantically pathetic guy named Bear (played by Michael Johnston) buys a tacky novelty toy called a "One Wish Willow" and wishes for his ultimate crush, Nikki (Inde Navarrette), to love him more than anyone else. She instantly transforms into a psychotically devoted, obsessive partner.
It is a brilliant conceptual framework for a dark psychological thriller about consent, male entitlement, and the horrific loss of personal autonomy. Unfortunately, the execution is an absolute trainwreck. Obsession is a profoundly overrated, deeply disgusting, and agonizingly boring film where absolutely nothing of substance actually happens.
A Two-Hour Walking Simulator of Mild Discomfort
When you watch a horror film about a supernatural wish gone wrong, you expect escalating stakes, a building sense of dread, or a frantic race to break the curse. Instead, Obsession delivers a narrative flatline.
Once the wish is made, the movie completely stalls. For the vast majority of the runtime, nothing happens. Bear sits on a couch looking vaguely uncomfortable, while Nikki stands in the room staring at him with a wide, robotic grin. There are no clever subplots, no building tension, and no creative supernatural world-building.
The film relies entirely on repetitive, agonizingly long scenes where characters simply misread social cues or sit in agonizing silence. It trades actual cinematic pacing for ambient emptiness, forcing the audience to endure a hollow waiting room of a movie.
Terrible Acting and Non-Existent Characters
A high-concept psychological thriller requires immense dramatic gravity from its cast to ground the absurdity of the plot. Obsession has the dramatic weight of a high school theater rehearsal.
The performances are thoroughly wooden and flat. Michael Johnston plays Bear with a monotonous, bumbling passivity that makes it impossible to root for his survival or care about his regret. He reacts to a terrifying supernatural paradigm shift with the mild annoyance of someone who received the wrong order at a drive-thru.
Furthermore, the script treats its characters like paper-thin caricatures. We learn absolutely nothing about Nikki other than the fact that Bear thinks she is attractive. Because she is completely denied any real characterization or humanity before the curse takes hold, her subsequent transformation carries zero emotional weight. She isn't a tragic victim of a magical curse; she is just a collection of creepy facial expressions operating solely because the script demands it.
Shock-Value Disgust Masked as "Depth"
What makes Obsession truly unwatchable is how it attempts to mask its lack of plot by veering into pure, unearned disgust. As the curse deepens, Nikki begins to engage in senseless acts of cruelty and grotesque behavior.
Film essayists and critics have swarmed to defend these disgusting sequences, writing pretentious articles claiming the film is a revolutionary masterwork deconstructing "modern dating culture" and the "male loneliness epidemic". But let’s call it what it is: cheap, trashy shock value.
[The Movie's Illusion] Deep critique on toxic modern relationships
[The Actual Reality]  Senseless cruelty, robotic acting, and zero plot progression
The filmmakers didn't include these repulsive elements to provoke intellectual thought; they included them because they didn't know how to write a functional second act. Depicting a woman being stripped of her humanity and sanity without giving her any agency or depth isn't "elevated horror"—it is just lazy writing masquerading as profound art.
The Verdict
Obsession is a classic case of a killer premise completely squandered by amateur filmmaking. It is a slow, ugly, and frustratingly hollow experience that punishes the audience for expecting a coherent narrative. The massive box office receipts don't prove the movie is good; they just prove that a clever marketing hook can convince millions of people to pay money to watch absolutely nothing happen.
Save yourself the frustration, ignore the hype, and leave this particular wish ungranted.

buy my books

Recycled Plots, Constant Threat: Why "Fauda" and "Tehran" Are Still Great TV

If you have watched more than two seasons of Netflix's Fauda or Apple TV’s Tehran , you have likely experienced a distinct sense of déj...