Why Today’s Far-Right Romanticizes History’s Biggest Flops

Walk into any radical internet subculture today and look at the profile pictures or forum banners. Or go to a racist white nationalist rally like Charlottesville 2017. You will see a deep obsession with the imagery of the defeated.

Groups like the Pagan Vikings, the Byzantine Empire, the Crusaders, Napoleon, the American Confederacy, Nazi Germany, and Rhodesian brush fighters all have one thing in common: they lost catastrophically. They saw their states dismantled, their economies shattered, or left their nations in absolute ruins.

This presents a bizarre paradox. Modern extremists constantly preach about strength, efficiency, and civilizational survival. Yet, they choose to "glaze" movements that crashed and burned. Why do history's biggest flops become romanticised internet memes? The answer lies in a subconscious psychological trap that turns total failure into a pristine, unchallengeable illusion.

---

Part 1: The "Loser Lineup" vs. Historical Reality

To understand this phenomenon, we must contrast the internet fantasy of these regimes with the grim, messy historical reality of their collapses, tracked from the earliest failures to the most recent.

🛡️ 1. The Pagan Vikings (Collapsed c. 1066)

• The Internet Fantasy: Hyper-masculine, axe-wielding pagan warriors who dominated through pure physical strength and rejected outside influence.
• The Historical Reality: As a political and religious movement, pagan Viking culture completely lost. They quickly realized that their decentralized, raiding-based lifestyle was unsustainable. To survive, the Viking kings abandoned paganism entirely, converted to Christianity, built European-style centralized kingdoms, and integrated into the modern world. The "badass pagan" era lasted barely 250 years before it went completely obsolete.

⚔️ 2. The Crusaders (Collapsed 1291)

• The Internet Fantasy: Holy, unstoppable warriors in immaculate white armor, defending European civilization with absolute unity.
• The Historical Reality: A strategic disaster from start to finish. They spent a massive amount of time murdering fellow European Christians—most famously during the brutal Sack of Constantinople in 1204, where Crusaders literally destroyed the very city modern right-wingers romanticise. The fragile Crusader States were plagued by internal backstabbing, terrible logistics, and completely collapsed within two centuries.

🏛️ 3. Constantinople and the Byzantine Empire (Collapsed 1453)

• The Internet Fantasy: A grand, unyielding, hyper-pious Christian empire that fell only because it was tragically outnumbered by an overwhelming Islamic Ottoman siege in 1453. Calls to make Constantinople and Hagia Sophia Christian or Greek again.
• The Historical Reality: The fall of Constantinople was the result of a centuries-long internal collapse fueled by absolute incompetence, corruption, and economic suicide. To pay for petty civil wars, Byzantine emperors literally sold off their own tax rights to Italian city-states like Venice, hollowing out their own treasury. By 1453, the mighty city wasn't a thriving superpower; it was a ghost town. The population had withered from 500,000 down to a measly, impoverished 50,000 people living surrounded by abandoned, overgrown weed fields. When the final siege happened, the Emperor could only scrape together 7,000 soldiers to defend the walls because his own citizens were too busy fighting religious civil wars over whether to submit to the Pope. They bankrupted and destroyed themselves from within long before the first Ottoman cannon fired.

👑 4. Napoleon Bonaparte (Collapsed 1815)

• The Internet Fantasy: The ultimate, unbothered military genius who conquered a continent through sheer alpha-male willpower.
• The Historical Reality: Militarily and economically, Napoleon left France completely broken, bankrupt, depopulated, and occupied by foreign armies. Furthermore, his Napoleonic Code permanently shattered feudal hierarchies by completely emancipating European Jews and tearing down ghetto walls. For modern racial nationalists, his actual policy legacy is a total contradiction.

🇺🇸 5. The Confederacy (Collapsed 1865)

• The Internet Fantasy: Noble, gentlemanly rebels fighting for "heritage" and traditional agrarian life against a soulless industrial machine.
• The Historical Reality: They lasted a measly four years. They built a fragile, unstable economy entirely reliant on human bondage, got their major cities burned to the ground, and surrendered unconditionally.

🪖 6. The Nazi Regime (Collapsed 1945)

• The Internet Fantasy: The absolute pinnacle of military efficiency, hyper-advanced technology, and unyielding discipline.
• The Historical Reality: A chaotic, drug-fueled, 12-year dictatorship built on institutional incompetence. Their racial paranoia caused a massive "brain drain" that chased away top scientific minds like Albert Einstein. Their erratic military strategy locked Germany into a suicidal multi-front war it could never win, resulting in their country being physically sliced in half and occupied for decades.

🇿🇼 7. The Rhodesians (Collapsed 1979)

• The Internet Fantasy: The ultimate hyper-masculine "retro" military aesthetic—short-shorts, FN FAL rifles, and a rugged bush-warrior lifestyle.
• The Historical Reality: A tiny, completely unrecognized breakaway colony that isolated itself from the entire world. They went completely bankrupt trying to maintain an unsustainable minority-rule apartheid state and collapsed into total political and economic ruin within 15 years.

---

Part 2: The Tom Holland Paradox and the Crucifixion Complex

Why do people who claim to value strength worship regimes that lost so definitively? The explanation lies in what can be called the Tom Holland Paradox.

In his book Dominion, historian Tom Holland argues that the Western mind is completely saturated in Christian morality. Ancient pagans worshiped the winners—they respected Julius Caesar or Alexander the Great because they conquered and ruled. But Christianity flipped the script. It taught the Western subconscious that the defeated have moral virtue, that the underdog is inherently pure, and that the powerful winner is a corrupt bully.

The political Left openly embraces this thought process. It champions the underdog, driving movements like "Free Palestine" or traditional anti-capitalist socialism, where the oppressed are automatically viewed as holding the moral high ground.

The far-right twist is that despite claiming to hate modern "victim culture" and romanticising pagan strength, they fall into the exact same Christian psychological trap. By worshiping the Confederacy, the Nazis, or the Fall of Constantinople, they are actively looking for a political crucifixion.

Defeat is a rigid requirement for their worship. If a regime survives, it must govern. It has to pass budgets, fix sewage systems, compromise with neighbors, and deal with corruption. It becomes messy, compromised, and human. But because these regimes were utterly destroyed by overwhelming global forces, extremists can freeze them in time as "pure, martyred victims" who died fighting a corrupt modern world. Defeat protects their heroes from the burden of reality, keeping them frozen in an illusion of pristine perfection.

[Actual Government] ───> Must Rule ───> Compromises, Corruption, Failure
[Defeated Regime]   ───> Destroyed ───> Frozen in Time as a "Pure Martyr"

---

Part 3: The Insanity of Repetition vs. The China Model

Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result is the classic definition of insanity. Obsessively trying to "be great again" by mimicking history’s biggest flops is political insanity. If you copy a system that resulted in total destruction, you will likely achieve total destruction.

If you want to see what actual civilizational survival looks like, look at modern China.

Following their "Century of Humiliation" in the 19th and 20th centuries, China did not try to obsessively recreate the extinct Qing Dynasty. They did not waste centuries larping as ancient Han Dynasty warlords or wearing silk robes while crying about British gunboats. They realized their old system was broken.

Instead, they initiated a massive cultural and economic reformation. They embraced industrialization, adopted modern global statecraft, utilized Western capitalist tools, and built an untouchable 21st-century technological superpower. They fixed what was broken by looking forward to the future, not backward to the past. They chose to adapt and win rather than fail and romanticise the loss.

                             

---

Conclusion: True Heritage vs. Internet Cosplay

Civilizations survive through reformation, not regression. True greatness is not found in history's ashes, nor is it frozen in a state of romanticized defeat.

If a culture wants to survive, it must stop living in the past trying to resurrect broken regimes. It must adapt to the future, shed its self-destructive illusions, and have the courage to reform. Anything else is just internet cosplay—a digital security blanket for people who would rather feel like tragic, pure martyrs than do the hard work of winning in the real world.

The Explorer’s Secret Bloodline: Why the Only Living Descendants of Frederick Selous Are Black Africans

 Introduction: The Myth vs. The Reality

History remembers Captain Frederick Courteney Selous as the quintessential Victorian explorer. Known as the ultimate big-game hunter, a fearless warrior for the British Empire, and the primary real-life inspiration for H. Rider Haggard’s fictional hero Allan Quatermain, his exploits were celebrated in the highest echelons of London society. In his popular memoirs, such as Sunshine and Storm in Rhodesia, Selous painted a picture of a rugged pioneer taming an untamed wilderness, presenting a carefully curated image of European purity and imperial duty.

Yet, beneath this tightly controlled Eurocentric facade lay a deeply guarded secret. Away from the flashing cameras of the British press and the polite tea parties of English high society, Selous lived a double life. He married three African women and fathered multiple mixed-race children. When he died a celebrated hero in 1917, the newly established white-minority Rhodesian administration took drastic, illegal steps to bury his African lineage and protect his imperial mythos. By weaponising racist colonial legislation, the state stripped his Black children of their rightful inheritance. However, a profound historical irony awaited: while Selous's legal European bloodline would completely vanish within a generation, his hidden African lineage survived, creating a thriving, living legacy that endures to this day.

Part I: The Hidden African Wives and Secret Families

Long before his conventional European marriage to Marie Catherine Gladys Maddy in 1894, Selous embedded himself deeply within the social structures of Southern Africa. Operating outside the strict confines of Victorian moral panic, he entered into customary marriages with three African women from distinct regional ethnic groups.

His first union was with an Ndebele woman in Matabeleland (Southern Rhodesia), who bore him a daughter named Magdalen in 1874. Later, as his hunting and scouting expeditions expanded, he formed unions with a Tswana woman in modern-day Botswana, resulting in the birth of his son, John, in 1900. His third family branch was established with a Manyika woman in eastern Zimbabwe, who gave birth to a son named Frederick, proudly named after his father.

To the British public, these families simply did not exist. Selous understood that acknowledging his African wives would instantly destroy his reputation as an imperial archetype, ruin his commercial book deals, and alienate his English wife and peers. Consequently, his published literature maintained a strict silence regarding his domestic life in Africa. He maintained a stark duality of existence, operating as a high-society gentleman in England while supporting a network of private African homesteads thousands of miles away.

Part II: Stolen Inheritance and the Rhodesian State

Despite his calculated public silence, private records and family accounts indicate that Selous did not abandon his African children. He was acutely aware of the harsh racial hierarchies forming in the region. To secure their future, Selous explicitly allocated substantial real estate holdings and tracts of land in the rapidly growing colonial hubs of Bulawayo and Salisbury (now Harare) to his Black children in his testamentary arrangements.

However, when Selous was killed in action by German forces in Tanzania in 1917 during World War I, his death triggered an immediate crisis for the colonial establishment. The white-minority Rhodesian administration viewed Selous as an indispensable propaganda tool—a symbol of white supremacy and British grit. The revelation that the great Frederick Selous had left his prime urban estates to mixed-race children threatened to undermine the entire psychological foundation of the colonial project.

In an act of state-sanctioned theft, the Rhodesian authorities stepped in to intercept his estate. Invoking early iterations of land segregation policies and colonial court precedents that refused to recognise the legal validity of native marriages or the rights of mixed-race heirs, the administration declared the African portion of Selous's will null and void. The valuable urban properties meant to provide financial security for Magdalen, John, and Frederick were systematically seized, appropriated, and redistributed to white settlers. Stripped of their financial lifeline, Selous’s African children were cast into legal and economic obscurity.

Part III: Forced Pseudonyms and the Modern Paper Trail

To survive the oppressive racial climate of early 20th-century Southern Africa, Selous's children were forced to adapt. Understanding that the "Selous" name brought dangerous scrutiny from a hostile state, they went into hiding. Selous himself had funded their education in South Africa under strict secrecy, instructing them to use pseudonyms to break any public link to his estate.

His son Frederick, for instance, grew up and lived under the assumed surname of "Fisher." This tactical survival mechanism successfully shielded the family from colonial persecution, but it simultaneously achieved what the Rhodesian state wanted: the complete erasure of the Selous paper trail. Decades of census data, school registries, and employment records buried their true identity under common, non-descript surnames.

Because official state archives were deliberately compromised or swept clean of these connections, the survival of Selous’s true legacy relied entirely on oral history. Generation after generation, elders within the family quietly passed down the truth of their lineage through spoken word, preserving the family tree in defiance of official colonial records. Today, known descendants of these branches reside as private citizens across Zimbabwe, South Africa, and Botswana. They intentionally maintain a quiet veil of privacy, opting out of the public spotlight due to the historical trauma and political sensitivities that continue to surround their ancestor's name.

Part IV: The Ultimate Historical Irony

The story of Frederick Selous culminates in one of the most remarkable paradoxes in the history of European imperialism. Following his death, his "legitimate" white lineage in England faced immediate tragedy. 

In 1894, at the age of 42, Selous returned to England and married 20-year-old Marie Catherine Gladys Maddy, the daughter of a clergyman. Together, they settled in Surrey and had three sons, whose lineage ultimately came to an end:

• Frederick Hatherley Bruce Selous: Born in 1898, he became a Captain in the Royal Flying Corps. He was shot down and killed in action in Belgium on 4 January 1918—exactly one year after his father's death (Selous, the father was killed by a German sniper in Tanzania on 4 January 1917). The son died unmarried and left no descendants.
• Harold Sherborn Selous: Born in 1899, Harold lived until 1954. He did not have any surviving children, meaning his branch of the family line ended with his passing.
• Bertrand Selous: Born prematurely on 6 July 1915, Bertrand tragically survived for only five days, passing away on 11 July 1915.

Because none of his children with Gladys Maddy produced ongoing heirs, Selous’s formal European family tree became completely extinct in the mid-20th century.

Meanwhile, despite poverty, forced displacement, and systemic erasure, his hidden African bloodline thrived. The children of his Ndebele, Tswana, and Manyika wives had large, multi-generational families. As a result, the only people on Earth who carry the genetic material and blood of Frederick Selous today are Black and mixed-race Africans.

Part V: The Historical Paradox of the Selous Name

The intersection of Selous's family history and regional military history presents a striking historical paradox. In the 1970s, during the Rhodesian Bush War, the Rhodesian Army formed an elite special forces regiment named the Selous Scouts in his honour.

Though named after an imperial icon, the regiment itself was a highly integrated militia, featuring a significant number of Black African soldiers fighting alongside white officers. The ultimate historical irony remains centered on the genetics of the name: while the integrated military unit carried the "Selous" moniker into battle during the civil conflict, the actual biological descendants and living blood relatives of Frederick Selous were the multi-racial and Black citizens living within those very African communities.

---

A Duality of Existence: The Two Legacies of Frederick Selous

Historical Dimension	The Public English Mythos	The Hidden African Reality
Marital Legacy	Legally married to Marie Gladys Maddy in England (1894).	Customary marriages to three Ndebele, Tswana, and Manyika women.
Fate of Bloodline	Extinct. His white son died in WWI; no surviving heirs remain.	Thriving. Multi-generational descendants live across Southern Africa today.
Surname Status	Placed on military units (Selous Scouts) and high-society books.	Hidden under pseudonyms like "Fisher" to survive colonial state hostility.
The Inheritance	Commemorated via British museum collections and family inheritances.	Real estate left in Bulawayo and Salisbury illegally voided and seized by the state.